Help your fellow builder by leaving your feedback based on these three criteria:
- Originality: How original is this - never seen before?
- Building Techniques: How much skill do you think the creator of this MOC has, in terms of building technique?
- Details: Express how much you like the details of the build.
Your feedback is only shown to the creator as well as yourself. It is not available for other users to see. The creator won't see your user name.
Zero Day Thanks
Well, another project expires within hours. I try to give the Ideas Community something different, something truly original. But it's the familliar (3rd party IP) that typically gets the most attention. Maybe this will come back when I figure out some new dynamic to add. But with only ten extra supporters than the original post, despite proper rendering and photography, I wouldn't bet on it.
Thanks to the supporters and followers. Please look for other planet and non-planet projects to come.
Alternate Reality
For a different take on the same scenario, please see Stephanix's Anatomini project:
https://ideas.lego.com/projects/a7687039-bb20-45f4-b8e4-11619720245c
Whether you want one or not, it deserves your support (costs nothing.)
Or, if you'd rather see a project with an inverse relationship between Earth and the ISS, please see:
https://ideas.lego.com/projects/2cb28449-bb17-41d0-bb0e-8dc70df36962
Design Discrepancies
It has been made clear that simple screengrabs are unacceptable and proposals utilizing them won't be taken seriously. Meanwhile, others won't support anything without actual photography. While I see benefits to all three, some project elements do not yet exist; trans-blue plates in this case. Thus, the observant reader will notice differences between the images posted; one cannot build with or photograph that which does not exist. As I become more familiar with the required processes, the potential for these types of errors will reduce. Thanks for your support and/or patience. Remember, it's just an Idea.
Also, the original metric measurement is erroneous. It should read 150mm or 15cm. My apologies.